KeeperAI

Wichita No Wrong Door

Oracle Track — 90-day pilot dashboard, operating model, and business case for Wichita's $500K homelessness prevention and foster-youth transition challenge. This solution coordinates existing Wichita providers — it does not create a parallel system.

🚨

Curveball Active — Emergency Reroute Mode

Open Door is offline (48–72 hrs). 211 Kansas is overloaded. CrossRoads is at 1 of 12 beds with 4 foster-placement disruptions incoming. The system has shifted to alternate intake routing: Center of Hope absorbs daytime overflow, SOUL Family and DCF IL prioritize the 4 disrupted youth, and the intake queue deprioritizes non-urgent cases to protect capacity. No-wrong-door logic stays intact — the front door just moves.

PEOPLE HOMELESS

736

2025 PIT Count, Wichita

BED MISMATCH

87 / 17

Unused / usable beds

AVG DURATION

45 days

vs. 176-day national avg

FOSTER YOUTH RISK

17%→42%

Homelessness by age 17→21

$500K Pilot Allocation

Use of funds

$500KPilot Budget

Oracle Deliverables

What this dashboard covers

Transition bottleneck dashboard (Power BI)
Use-of-funds model — $500K breakdown
Prioritization model — urgency scoring
Youth handoff failure analysis (Power BI)
Cost-of-instability analysis
Pilot KPI framework — 90-day scorecard
Renewal case — year-two justification

Pilot KPI Targets

90-day scorecard

Oracle Deliverable Breakdown

Use of Funds

$140K — Intake + case-management coordination
$110K — Readiness, documents, transportation
$100K — Marketing, trust-building, adoption
$90K — Analytics, reporting, renewal proof
$60K — Contingency for emergency adaptation

Prioritization Model

Highest urgency first (weather displacement)
Disrupted foster youth next (4 incoming)
Document-ready placements move faster
Best-fit bed + program matching by need
No youth-only lane — integrated flow

Youth Handoff Failure

12.5% of youth have no intake record at all
0.3% employed at age 17 — 17% already homeless
By 21: 42% homeless, 44% employed
77.2% of program slots go unused
KanCare dropout rate: 42% — highest in system

Cost of Instability

Repeated referrals waste case-manager hours
Failed handoffs add delay + rework per person
Unstable housing increases ER + crisis-system load
Longer waits reduce successful placement rates
Coordination is cheaper than repeat crisis cycling

Transition Bottleneck

SNAP Enrollment: 30-day processing delay
KanCare Enrollment: 21 days
Birth cert + SSN add 2 more weeks
Affordable units cluster in high-risk, low-transit zones
Document speed + transit access must be solved together

Renewal Case

Year-two justified if failed handoffs drop measurably
Bed matching improves over 90-day baseline
Document completion rate rises above 60%
Youth follow-through tracked end-to-end
Landlord response rate proves market confidence

90-Day KPI Framework

KPI	Type	Target	Status
Intake completion rate	Input	≥ 80%	In progress
Same-day bed matching	Process	≥ 65%	In progress
Document completion rate	Process	≥ 60%	At risk
Youth handoff success	Process	≥ 70%	At risk
Stabilization success	Outcome	≥ 55%	In progress
Time-to-placement (days)	Outcome	≤ 14 days	In progress
Landlord response rate	Outcome	≥ 60%	On track
Provider onboarding	Input	100% of 8 partners	On track

⚡ Curveball adaptation: The prioritization model reroutes intake away from Open Door to Center of Hope and NEXTenant for the next 48–72 hours. The 4 disrupted foster youth are flagged as Priority 1 in the queue. 211 overflow is absorbed via a direct provider-contact list distributed to outreach workers.

✓ Renewal signal: If the 90-day pilot demonstrates a 20%+ reduction in failed handoffs and documents completed before placement, Wichita has a strong case for year-two funding and system-wide adoption.